[nailer]

> 1) it takes a undergrad to make and measure a superconductor by a Nobel laureate to explain it.

This first sentence is vague. Are you saying things must be made before they can be explained, as the sentence reads?

Or is there a typo and this should be “and a Nobel laureate to explain it”?

[tecleandor]

I think there's a typo: by=but

Edit: already explained

[fouc]

I was rather confused by the grammar, replacing 'by' with 'and' makes so much more sense. Thanks

[sonium]

yes, you are right I meant to say "and a Nobel laureate to explain it"