[Nevermark]

A good case that consistent brainwashing is likely laborious to do manually.

But why leave the job to humans?

I expect an effective approach is to have model A generate many possible ways of testing model B, regarding an altered fact. Then update B wherever it hasn't fully incorporated the new "fact".

My guess is that each time B was corrected, the incidence of future failures to product the new "fact" would drop precipitously.