|
|
|
|
|
by turquoisevar
1052 days ago
|
|
Hardly comparable. One started a platform with an upfront communicated commission rate that, at the time, was literally received with applause because before that the rates were significantly worse for developers and has never raised the rate in its entire history (instead lowered it for certain circumstances). The other is a bait and switch, luring people onto the platform under one set of rules, only to pull the rug from under them years after the status quo was established and change the rules to impose a commission that didn’t apply to them until now. One is hard to argue as an anti-trust violation and the other is pretty much a textbook example. |
|