[caconym_]

> we've opened up being an artist to a wider audience.

No, we've opened up the ability for someone who writes a short textual description of an illustration to obtain an illustration ostensibly matching that description for a much lower cost than they might have paid for it before these technologies were available, e.g. by commissioning an artist.

You're right that technique can be abstractly separated from other aspects of the artistic process, but you miss how the inability to guide the application of technique will cut your capacity for expression off at the knees. The prompt is the art, such as it is, and the ability to iterate on versions of the prompt and parameters of the model to random-walk your way to a result that approximates what you were imagining is a very poor substitute for the ability to lay down the brush strokes yourself.

[CuriouslyC]

You can guide the application. We already have ControlNet, and tools like that are just in their infancy. By the time this stuff hits maturity tools like img2img and ControlNet will seem about as advanced as MS Paint vs Photoshop.

[marssaxman]

> No, we've opened up the ability for someone who writes a short textual description of an illustration to obtain an illustration ostensibly matching that description

Yes, that is the new art form which has been invented and opened up to a wider audience. By analogy, some people used to complain that DJs were not real musicians, because they just play records made by other people. While technically true, this observation is not interesting, because selecting and mixing records to create a larger sonic flow is its own art form.

[caconym_]

I have no problem saying that a prompt to an AI system and subsequent iteration on that prompt, model parameters, etc. can be a form of artistic expression. However, the distinction between this form of artistic expression and the form practiced by the artist whose works the model was trained on is substantive and has important moral and legal implications, so when it is conspicuously absent from these discussions I do indeed find it "interesting" enough to make explicit.

[ForestCritter]

exactly, if you had never seen Greg's work, you wouldn't be asking for it and would never create it. People want the results of someone elses labor.