[gcatalfamo]

I am going to be downvoted to death, but it is clear from last year events that Sam Altman is truly that kind of "Blade Runner/Robocop(1)"-like antagonist character that has a narcissistic drive to destroy the world just so he can show everybody he is saving it.

(1) Pick your 80's Sci-Fi movie dystopia that fits here.

[93po]

It seems unfair to attack someone so personally without providing neutrally presented evidence to support it

[monkaiju]

I feel theres plenty of evidence... he's a super rich public figure known to lie to get traction on his projects. He doesn't need your protection

[93po]

It's not about me protecting some billionaire that doesn't give a shit about me. It's about protecting reasonable discussion and trying to keep discussion in reality instead of it just being an echo chamber of "ai man bad". If I just wanted to see outrage and shitting on someone without substance I'd go read reddit and twitter.

Plenty of evidence... of which still none is being presented neutrally.

[ShamelessC]

There is a bunch of evidence in the article we're commenting on. Good faith assumption that people have all read the article before commenting is (supposedly) a premise of HN's culture. In practice, many people who comment are responding solely to a comment or to the title presented.

[koonsolo]

I read the article, didn't see any evidence of the above claims.

Still waiting for such evidence...

[tim333]

It won't be clear till he turns the AIs against us ;) For now he's more Anakin Skywalker bit do not underestimate the power of the dark side.

[somsak2]

what evidence concretely?