[MattPalmer1086]

I think you are talking about a different use case to the parent.

You seem to be talking about authorising businesses to take money from my account without needing further approval. A direct debit.

Parent is talking about transferring money to someone else's account, which is easy and requires no secrets or authorisation.

[wmf]

It would be nice to have both.

[MattPalmer1086]

Both already exist. Setting up a direct debit generally only involves filling in a form. Sending money to someone else is as simple as authorising a payment to them with their account details.

What problem needs to be solved?

[AnthonyMouse]

What's needed is a better system for approving who is allowed to make withdrawals from your bank account instead of just "anyone in possession of your bank routing information" which makes customers reluctant to provide it.

This would be essentially solved with a standardized system for customers to give each merchant a separate bank account number (or equivalent) which really refers to the same bank account but could be revoked individually if that number is compromised or you want to remove the merchant's access, or could be set to automatically expire for non-recurring payments. But the banks don't have the incentive to provide this when they're the ones getting the credit card fees.

[MattPalmer1086]

I like the idea of per merchant account numbers. Even better if we used some kind of cryptographic binding between the merchant account and your account, so it would not work for anyone else.

[wmf]

You can't really use ACH or Zelle for retail payments. It's not worth doing the setup for a one-time payment.