|
|
|
|
|
|
by JamesSwift
1056 days ago
|
|
|
> It's funny because maybe it's a good service but going by HN, it's not reliable or cost effective. This is a very unfair take, based on basically nothing but the single recent outage report it seems. Tarsnap is generally liked by HN and if you use it, you will know why. Its a great service technically, and _extremely_ affordable. I was a happy user for years but have moved to local time machine backups with B2 offsite replication just because its seamlessly integrated into my NAS (and is also very affordable). |
|
|