[dagw]

While I agree with everything you said, I kind of liked the AI-class because it was so short and superficial. I felt it gave me a very high level overview of field without taking up too much of my time.

So while the Coursera courses are better in the sense that they cover the material in much more detail and require that you understand the material much better to do the assignments, they end up being much harder for me to squeeze into my already hectic schedule. So in the end I think there is space for both approaches.

[aseembehl]

That is precisely why udacity courses are gaining popularity. They give you a false sense of accomplishment when actually the learning is very superficial.

[dagw]

Indeed, but there is nothing inherently wrong with superficial knowledge (as long you realize it is superficial). Before the AI-course I knew absolutely nothing about the field, now I know enough to start matching problem domains to techniques. Obviously I learnt nothing useful about how to actually implement those techniques, but at least I know what words to start googling for.

[tedmiston]

> They give you a false sense of accomplishment when actually the learning is very superficial.

I disagree. Although I've only taken one so far (search engines), and I knew basic Python before taking the course. I like the small weekly practice sessions because they provide just enough breadth to prompt me to seek more depth, run pydoc, etc.

I find it more interesting to learn the standard library and take away a better understanding in this format, as opposed to reading a book or the documentation straight through.