|
|
|
|
|
by michaelt
1055 days ago
|
|
> I don't get it, what else would you expect? Any claimed scientific breakthrough should generally be met with a healthy dose of skepticism at first. Well, I've heard the name LK-99 is from the initials of discoverers Lee and JH Kim, and the year of discovery (1999). So I don't buy that they were under great time pressure due to fear of getting scooped. Surely they'd have mountains of samples if they've been making it for 24 years? |
|