|
|
|
|
|
by mdp2021
1057 days ago
|
|
> I thought it was someone else's Eisenhower did not say it was his idea. See https://quoteinvestigator.com/2014/05/09/urgent/ > It is a great procedure That is a classification procedure¹, not a ranking procedure. It does not satisfy the original poster's request. ¹(Acted upon immediately; scheduled for action; delegated; dropped.) |
|
What I don't understand about your comment is the similarity to your scheme that just has the 'cost' dimention addionally. The 'cost' doesn't make the entities any more 'rankable' though. So why wouldn't I apply your critic to your own proposed system?
This comment is not in bad faith. I'm just a little confused about your point. If you have some sort of experience or qualification in this field, I'd be happy to be corrected.