|
|
|
|
|
by penneallagricia
1063 days ago
|
|
Winning a debate doesnt make your argument truer. It just means your opponent was weaker than you at making his argument. Agree or not with that judge but he makes a good point about favouring the validity of an argument over the ability of the debater. |
|
This is not correct; for an argument to be valid, the conclusion must follow from the premises.
That judge is saying he will vote based on the conclusion regardless of the premises.