|
|
|
|
|
|
by chipbarm
1056 days ago
|
|
|
In SQL as you've said, nullability is explicit. It's arguably the wrong way around (i.e. NOT NULL rather than NULLABLE), but it is explicit. I feel the issue comes from the intersection of languages without explicit nullability and their data storage techs; removing that explicit typing from SQL doesn't fix the issue. (I feel you agree with this btw, just being explicit) |
|
|