|
|
|
|
|
by ckz
1052 days ago
|
|
An interesting argument I've heard recently (but haven't yet come to a personal conclusion on, so don't take this as an endorsement): Emphasize math for older kids when their brain is better prepared for abstraction (some even argue age 10+!). Emphasize language and character for younger kids, especially because at _very_ young ages that's really what they're soaking in anyway. The logic here being efficiency. An older child can learn in a week what a preschooler may drill for months. Cover some math facts in primary school to build a strong foundation, but strong language skills compound against _all_ education and should come first, with a heavier shift to advanced mathematics later in schooling. Again, don't know if I ascribe yet (I was accelerated in math at a young age myself) or how this really looks in the real world, but definitely an argument that wise people make in good faith. Probably impossible in a standardized school setting. :) |
|
It’s also not a perfect system but much much better than what I grew up with in the US compared to what I’m seeing now with my son here.