|
|
|
|
|
by smoldesu
1055 days ago
|
|
> Computer scientists always consider the worst case scenario because it allows us to edge against the risk—or, well, certainty—that something will go wrong. > Why are people complaining about WEI and not PATs then? > Well, Google is simultaneously the owner of the most popular web browser (Chrome) and the most popular mobile operating system (Android) on top of which Chrome runs. WEI is guaranteed to be a recipe for anti-competitive practices. I don't follow. How is any of this exclusively harmful when WEI does it? Is Apple not also in a position to use PATs for anti-competitive purposes? |
|
At that point, it'll be left as an exercise for the remaining browser makers to slowly enshittify.
What's funny is that this trend could lead to the downfall of Chrome outside of Android and ChromeOS because at the end of the day, attestation is in the control of the OS maker.