[SV_BubbleTime]

I agree with you. The phrase is you don’t have backups unless you test your backups.

But in this case I don’t really get what the issue is. Restore everything from the last good backup and people miss some posts made in the meantime, sucks, but it’s an instant solution instead of hand work and uncertainty.

[NikkiA]

When I worked as a VMS sysadmin full restore checks were one of the things I insisted on doing, sure, it used up a morning every couple of weeks, and tied up one of our microvaxes, but it was worth it.

Especially three months after I finished being sysadmin and moved to development, and they had a disk failure.

me: 'so you have backups?'

the replacement: 'sure, but they didn't restore'

me: 'what's the last good backup you have?'

tr: 'august, the last one you did'

me: 'welp'

tr's boss: 'guess £390,000 for third party disk recovery is our only option...'

[NikkiA]

To add some context...

Yes, it was documented in our ISO 9000 docs. But only 'strongly recommended' to perform a regular/routine test restore. I attempted to get it converted to a mandatory step, but since I was only a temporary sysadmin and an intern, it wasn't going to happen.

I was told by my predecessor (who was a direct contractor to my employer) to perform it as routinely as I could. I would guess that he had attempted to get it put as a mandatory step, but his time was billed, mine wasn't, so shrug.

My/the replacement was an external contractor as part of a 'company Y now provides system administration services' deal, who presumably ended up eating the liability of not having working backups that they were contracted to produce.

As horrified as I was, 'it's not really my problem, I wasn't responsible' was the only attitude I could bear to take. Besides, I was busy with fortran.

[pbjtime]

"If you've never tested your backup solution, you don't have a backup solution."