It's not just the NSA buying this data right? So is it illegal when say a marketing agency buys the data? If not why should it become illegal for the government?
The second piece about comparing the government to a business isn't valid. There exist many laws and rules that apply only to the government.
Not that I agree with the distinction. I think companies larger than the US government at formation should probably have rules to keep them good for humanity.
Indeed. Many laws and regulations around government agencies (not US specific, as I’m in the EU) specify what the agency is allowed to do, rather than what it isn’t. This is much easier to enforce, although it does require more regular review of regulations (that specify the details) to keep with the time.
Why not? Historically, corporations have had armed private forces that they've used to kill people.
Although you may have miss the tamer recent version where Ebay sent "a bloody pig
mask, a funeral wreath, and a book entitled “Grief Diaries: Surviving Loss of a Spouse", practiced installing a GPS tracker and then travelled 3000 miles to install one, "The Defendants also posted the Steiner’s address on Craigslist
and other websites, inviting strangers to the Steiners’ home for sex parties, and
advertising yard sales".
The story has a happy ending though as "Defendant Wenig departed eBay with a $57 million severance package.".
That eBay story is wild, and does make you wonder how deep the rot must be in that company. Also, why on Earth does eBay need a "global intelligence center" and a "global security team"? Do they have a completely separate line of business that I'm not aware of?
At least one person went to prison, so there's that.
Any sufficiently powerful corporation is indistinguishable from a government. There aren't many corporations who currently exercise their money to get such power, but it's happened before and can certainly happen again.
As it turns out, a bloody pig mask isn't a drone and planting a GPS tracker isn't the equivalent of killing or maiming everyone at a wedding and the people that did this were subject to criminal penalties.
This is in contrast to militaries who are assumed to operate as legitimate extensions of foreign policy.
The second piece about comparing the government to a business isn't valid. There exist many laws and rules that apply only to the government.
Not that I agree with the distinction. I think companies larger than the US government at formation should probably have rules to keep them good for humanity.