| > I worked at Facebook for 4 years and also don't understand that comment. I have never worked for FB and I thought it was fine. None of that is FB-specific. > I take it being an L5 is a good thing? It's implied lower numbers are better. >> it was me and 20 other L8s interviewing for the same L6 opening > but just six months ago you were an L8, and competition to become an L6 was a coin toss? Yes, due to the number of people competing for the same position. > No idea what 'price discovery' could mean in this situation, other than a fairly weird way to say 'salary range'? Salary range implies stability. eg What a company is willing to pay for what positions. There has been a lack of standardization in talent across tech and instability in compensation. Another way to think of it is an increased risk tolerance in wages. This has been fueled by leniency in promotion/raises/hiring when profits were higher. > And any of this having to do with 'the bond market' is just baffling! Monetary policy (around interest rates) is directly related to profit margins and hiring. Suffice to say, this is common knowledge for anyone who owns property (beyond a car, maybe) or tracks the job market. |