[twoWhlsGud]

It would be great to understand (and perhaps everyone else has figured this out already) how much of this stuff is just bad people responding to incentives created by social media design for anger and how much is directed (at least at some level) by interests (e.g. oil or whatever) that want to see the issue fuzzed up.

If it's mainly the design of social media then how do we hold these folks to account for the damage?