[ggm]

It's such a contradictory article. It's conclusions are divorced from most of its substantive points.

Solar should have lower transmission cost overall because of local solar. I am unsure where "less efficient grids" comes from unless it's because of terawatts in a single giant coal burner or nuke. Non UK economies like mine have no nuclear and do have expensive transmission nets but it's a socialised cost and a net benefit overall.

He somehow elides over a 2 to 3x advantage in one space but worse overall. How worse? Why?

His strawman myth demolition was good.