|
|
|
|
|
by zetalyrae
1058 days ago
|
|
So there's differing views on this, Zig famously has the build system built in. To me, having them separate forces you to keep things simple, because the build system can't communicate with the compiler except through compiler-provided interfaces. Also, I think I like about languages like C, Rust, is that: if I wanted to, I could implement the build system without forking the compiler. In C specially because Make will print all the compiler invocations for you. It lets people build tooling that is not part of the compiler. I think it's good from a simplicity perspective that language users can figure out what set of compiler invocations a build file "compiles down" to. |
|
But, when you get big enough to where this sort of provided tool isn't enough, chances are tooling is now somebody's actual problem anyway, if you're a for-profit somebody's job is to look after the tooling, you can invest in learning a specialized tool or even writing one because that's a proportionate effort, it makes sense.