|
|
|
|
|
by rm999
1059 days ago
|
|
There's a lot of confusion in this thread about "before the big bang". I was also confused and did some googling and found this explanation from a professor of theoretical physics. It seems that it's actually pretty normal to refer to the big bang as happening after the initial inflationary epoch, but others refer to it as the moment before this. >Do not allow yourself to be confused: The Hot Big Bang almost certainly did not begin at the earliest moments of the universe. Some people refer to the Hot Big Bang as “The Big Bang”. Others refer to the Big Bang as including earlier times as well. This issue of terminology is discussed at the end of this article on Inflation [https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/relativity-...]. The article is talking about the "hot big bang", so it's using terminology that is accepted by other theoretical physicists. https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/relativity-... |
|
It sounds like they feel the commonly accepted understanding of the Big Bang is overbroad. Fine. Find new words to describe the subsets of the event. Redefining the word is just causing confusion.