|
|
|
|
|
by intelVISA
1056 days ago
|
|
I'm on the fence here: sadly it does seem that grinding LC is an optimal use of time for the avg job seeker. That said, not sure you can easily quantify projects as having no impact. Back when I was a seeker my resume had a handful of non-trivial public projects buried in a footnote and one would come up in about 75% of interviews. Despite bias I doubt this is too unique assuming the projs themselves are interesting. Remember: your entire resume is adtech for your skills to a future employer. I'm of the belief that if human eyes ever skim it: project: Java CLI fizz buzz will never outperform project: RISC-V microkernel in Rust. |
|