[snvzz]

You're right in that it is still actively developed by two different companies, and that it is still utterly dominant in servers, desktops, and laptops... today.

Perhaps you would prefer "incumbent ISA"? But that would be a pointless exercise, because RISC-V is inevitable, and the new industry standard.

The intent was to express "not RISC-V" anyway. The parent already specifies which.

[yjftsjthsd-h]

> Perhaps you would prefer "incumbent ISA"?

I wouldn't mind that.

> But that would be a pointless exercise, because RISC-V is inevitable, and the new industry standard.

Er. So even if the second part of the sentence were true, calling out the current leader isn't pointless. And the second part of your claim is very much not a foregone conclusion; RISC-V is a standard, and used by the industry, but it's not in anything like a dominant enough position to call it "the industry standard", and its success is certainly not inevitable - RISC-V is today where MIPS was a decade ago (cheap, modestly popular in embedded, lacking in high-end parts, not popular outside of embedded). Now, its trajectory is upwards, it has enough going for it that it could become extremely popular, and certainly I'd like an Open Source option to win - but that's just one possibility, and history is littered with ISAs that were supposed to be the Next Big Thing.

[snvzz]

>is very much not a foregone conclusion

It may very well be by now. RISC-V already has the momentum behind it.

The investment is there, and it's huge, both from governments and private. Major design wins. Multiple incoming very high performance implementations from multiple vendors.

On the software side, I have never seen a new architecture's software ecosystem grow as quickly as RISC-V's has.

>history is littered with ISAs that were supposed to be the Next Big Thing

You're well aware how RISC-V is better suited for success. Both technical, and non-technical aspects. It has the mojo.

I remember when PowerPC and ARM got their moments. This is an order of magnitude bigger. No ISA has ever managed to rally this much support, broad and wide. It's not even close.

I'm telling you: x86 is finally going down.

RISC-V is inevitable.

[cross]

Probably true. Porting rxv64 to RISC-V probably wouldn't be that big of a lift, honestly.

[stockerta]

After Rust fanboys, the other annoying ones are Risc-V fanboys.

[snvzz]

RISC-V is inevitable.

Why wouldn't you be happy about it?