[Atlas22]

If you expected to learn useful finance at a university, you already failed as soon as you applied. If anyone there knew what they were doing financially, they wouldnt be there, and especially not teaching Finance 102. In case you were not aware, nearly all professors hate teaching lower level classes, so they naturally get forced on the worst performing professors (the ones that are closest to getting fired).

Concluding that the entirety of TA can not be useful (the Null hypothesis is true for all input signals) just from seeing that a few strawman TA in finance 102 not work is beyond absurd.

[btilly]

If some version of TA worked, then as soon as enough traders adopt that version of TA, it would stop working.

That is not to say that no versions of TA will work. After all Long Term Capital made a fortune on reversion to the mean...right until they went bankrupt. (And then their portfolio went on to make a fortune again. Too bad they were insolvent.) But it will only continue to work if the trading strategy is not widely known, or comes with trading risks.

[cde-v]

The fact that you think a finance degree is centered around trading stocks tells me all I need to know about you and your beliefs. And even on the topic of stocks/derivatives, are they teaching the wrong dividend discount model? Or the wrong black-scholes model? Did they get the equation wrong or something? Or are you just mad because they aren’t teaching TA?

And just wondering, using TA, how would you calculate how much to change an M&A offer in order to compensate for including a poison pill?