| >Leaving aside a debate over whether her work is a good match for “woke”, she very much cannot have been woke before woke was a thing A game of being pedantic is always welcome: She very well could have been "woke before woke was a thing", because "woke" as the parent means it in her case, refers to the modern usage (of like, 2 decades), not the original term of the 40s that might have preceeded her birth. So take the parent's comment to mean: "She was woke, in the modern, circa-2000s+ sense, before woke, in the modern circa-2000s+ sense was a thing, not in the 1950s namesake sense". Similar to how somebody could have been a hipster (in the 2000s+ sense [1]) before a hipster was a thing (before 2000s), even if they have been born in the 70s. Sure, the term already existed before the 70s, but it referred to a different thing. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hipster_(contemporary_subcultu... |
The only newer sense is the American Right’s use of the term to replace “political correctness” as an empty epithet for everything and everyone it disagrees with.