| > It made fine sense to me, "Fine sense"? Even that isn't a standard phrase. I doubt you, TBH. Each paragraph barely coheres. Examples: > an entirely ideological win What does that mean? > there is a fully documented dearth of information ... is nonsensical. > a mere quandary of any part of the system More nonsense. > in the completely free entirety of information available until time itself forgets it ... wut? > adopt there new role Benefit of the doubt: typo Doesn't make sense even fixed, though. > segregated fully autonomous systems loosely networked together ... wut? > the same status that all 99th percentile that all previous technology What? > The nerds won, we made computers into a skilled labor. Always was. This is word salad. If you scan very hastily and you're not good at skimming -- and writing online for 10s to 100s of thousands of readers a day has taught me that many people can't skim to save their lives but they don't know that they can't -- it may look superficially like coherent English text, but it isn't. |
>> an entirely ideological win
> What does that mean?
ideological win makes sense. what's an entirely ideological win? one without non-ideological impact.
>> there is a fully documented dearth of information
> ... is nonsensical.
disagree. it is entirely sensical for a dearth of information about a well-defined topic to be documented. see: every github issue for project documentation ever.