|
|
|
|
|
by JS_startup
5210 days ago
|
|
I'm still baffled as to why Windows 8 is not a dedicated tablet OS. I think it would be a dream to use on a touch device and commend Microsoft for the Metro design, but they had to screw it up by shoehorning it onto the desktop too. I've given Windows 8 an honest try on my dual monitor setup and it just isn't happening. Metro is out of place, consumes 100% screen real estate (meaning fast context switching between windows or monitoring multiple windows is impossible) and is constantly frustrating with its hidden controls and undiscoverable features. The fact that they had to include Windows 7 in Windows 8 is proof enough that Metro is not suitable for the desktop. Windows 8 feels like a bizarre mashup OS that has no place on the desktop. |
|
The inclusion of 16-bit mode, XP mode, or compatibility mode in Windows 7 just proves that 32-bit computers are not suitable for the desktop.
The inclusion of GCN compatibility on the Wii proves the Wii is not a good game console.
The inclusion of VGA ports on my new laptop proves HDMI is not suitable for video display.
This is Microsoft, not Apple. Microsoft cares that your old applications keep running. Microsoft (figuratively) never breaks backwards compatibility (and if they do, there's a huge fuss made about it). Microsoft even goes as far to include very specific lines of code in their OS to make sure just one popular application keeps working (as shown by the now-famous example of SimCity for DOS running on Windows).
How much bitching was there when DOS was shoved to the background? And who would return to DOS now? You'll get over it. The world will survive.