|
|
|
|
|
by smallnamespace
1057 days ago
|
|
Papers are mostly read by other researchers, where the added background is actively bad because it obscures the real meat of the paper to the main audience. If you just wanted a digestible intro then you would usually buy a textbook. I think the argument that every research paper ought to be a mashup of a textbook + the actual research to be a bit silly from a “people should specialize at what they’re good at” standpoint. Put in another context, I also don’t want every recipe to reintroduce what it means to “fry” or “braise” or “marinate”. We have Google for that. |
|