|
|
|
|
|
by RajT88
1061 days ago
|
|
Such things rarely have a single succinct answer. In reality, there's other factors: - Legacy applications where nobody wanted to rewrite them to work with non-IE - Chrome gained market share because the entire user experience was better. That includes updates, but also it was just really snappy to use. Speed is probably the bigger factor; normal users don't care about updates. - As some have pointed out, lots of less technical users just use the default - Did I mention those couple decades worth of legacy apps? It bears repeating, since MSFT had successfully kept other browsers out of market share through their 1-2 punch of strategic browser incompatibility and shipping with the OS. |
|
Chrome started out not being targeted by these, and in addition, Google pushed security patches pretty quickly.
Anyone got any numbers on the frequency of exploits, and the mean time-to-patch, for IE vs Chrome, over time?