Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by WalterBright 1058 days ago
Extremely unfair? After he did that, a Constitutional Amendment was passed to stop that from happening again. Presidents have an enormous advantage in reelection, and the country was concerned that we were at risk of a "president for life".

He was quite ill during his final term, which put him at a severe disadvantage in negotiating with Stalin. This was hidden from the public.

1 comments

If he shouldn’t have done that why didn’t the American people sent him packing out of office? Why the arbitrary term limit of eight years?
Because the American people don't really choose who's on the final ballot. For all we know FDR in 1944 was considered "just ok", but was better than his opponent.
Then that was the fault of a lack of a challenger within the Democratic nomination. And if they really wanted to, more delegates should have voted for Harry Byrd:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1944_Democratic_National_Conve...

Given that Americans tend to reelect presidents during wartime, that makes the claim that FDR was somehow unpopularly "just ok" to be even more dubious.