At that time in Christian West, the notion of "Judeo-Christianity" would be considered an oxymoron. But it is possible that the general is question is in fact alluding to that era from ignorance.
So "Judeo-Christianity" in this context is just a euphemism for "Christianity."
> What has become known as the People's Crusade passed through Germany and indulged in wide-ranging anti-Jewish activities, including the Rhineland massacres.
>So "Judeo-Christianity" in this context is just a euphemism for "Christianity."
Yes, as it's more often than not used. It's basically "what evolved as Christiatity, through the adoption of Judean-originating ways of belief" (as opposed to pagan ones).
What's specifically wrong about the first crusade? It was in response to the rise of the seljuk Turks and their advance on the Byzantines and also similar to the Muslim invasions of the middle east, northern africa, southern italy, and spain.
That area of the world had changed hands between Rome and Persia for hundreds of years before then as well.
Ah, the Crusades were good because the Moors invading Europe was good? Or is this another case of "You say what we did was bad, but people who I think are terrible also did the same thing, therefore what we did was actually good!"
I guess this adds "also other people did things like that" to it, but are you saying anything here you couldn't also say about slavery or serial killing?