Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by invalidOrTaken 1064 days ago
I had pizza with the author once.

This makes sense:

>Well-grounded values, which is to say values that actually serve and accelerate life rather than deplete it, come from only one source: hard engagement with reality, where you can form an experience-building feedback loop of trial, error, and vitality.

and this:

>Our most important low-hanging fruit is to recognize the problem: most of the values we learn from the institutions around us are fake and exploitative. They do not represent our real interests.

And this:

>In contrast to these false values, what we can do is recognize and orient ourselves more rigorously to Abraham’s hard natural values. Are you winning at a biological level? Are you getting more territory at a more sovereign level of control? Are you living rigorously in contact with natural law? Are you working on something that will achieve eternal fame? Are your enemies being cursed and your friends blessed? Does your winning at these things serve any great and higher plan of blessing for all creation and all peoples?

>These are not the root of all value. But absent some kind of reliable revelation as to the deeper wishes of the higher powers, as Abraham had when he almost sacrificed Isaac, anything that doesn’t credibly offer you help towards these values is not your friend.

That last part (a bit uncomfortably!) reminds me of the more cult-y parts of the startup ecosystem.

1 comments

> some kind of reliable revelation as to the deeper wishes of the higher powers, as Abraham had

So God talked to Abraham? God exists?

If you believe the account in Genesis, yes on both fronts.

And if you don't, well, then you have no known content for the story of Abraham sacrificing Isaac. For that matter, you have no known content for anything else in Abraham's life.

Choosing to believe that Abraham existed but God doesn't and didn't is... not supportable by the only text we have.

You are basically saying: "If you believe the answer then that is the case."

That answer can be given to ANY question and it is as true there as in your case. In other words it is a tautology. It provides no new information.

Yeah man