|
|
|
|
|
by SQueeeeeL
1056 days ago
|
|
I'm not really sure what "the problem" with this is? Like we all do know that the point of pharma companies is to make money, and that things like 'helping people' are just incidental byproducts of that fact. If pharmaceutical development was government run, I'd understand the outage at lowering the quality of life of US citizens; but faceless corporations literally cannot act in a way that is not financially optimal without committing a crime. |
|
I think you found it:
> corporations literally cannot act in a way that is not financially optimal without committing a crime
The “problem” is that perverse incentives lead to unethical behavior that most would find distasteful and morally reprehensible.
I don’t understand the criteria for outrage that you’re hinting at. The fact that it’s not government run doesn’t make this less disturbing. It does change where one might direct their outrage.