[thebooktocome]

Mere identity is not usually covered under attorney-client privilege, I’m not sure why you think it would be.

Here’s a semi-recent analysis of the situation.

https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2020/05/fifth...

[tiahura]

I’m not sure why you think it would be.

Probably because it is confidential and most people, and many attorneys, don’t understand that privilege and confidentiality are terms of art with distinct meanings.