[skwirl]

LLMs are good at a lot of things we don't have a good reason to expect them to be good at. It's very hard to come up with "theoretical reasons" it should be good at things, in "theory" they should not be nearly as capable as they are. Even NLP researchers have been shocked at how well this has worked.

[thumbuddy]

If there is no theory, or expected result why should anyone care what it's good at or not? You kinda get what you get and if you don't get what you want you do what?