Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mitt_romney_12 1063 days ago
A gun isn't going to protect you from police violence, it's just going to give them a reason to become even more militarized and an excuse after they shoot you
2 comments

You might be surprised how much a group of armed citizens can do against a police squad. I don't think “you’ll never protect yourself from the gov’t” is an accurate angle.
When has this actually happened? I think you'd find only very rare exceptions.

It's a fantasy. And it's destructive for the community to replace rule of law with rule of whoever-has-more-guns.

Temporarily.

In the long run? Nah. Eventually the APCs roll in.

In the long run they will run out of jackboots willing to risk not coming home to their families at the end of the day.
Not unless "group of armed citizens" refers to a large-scale rebellion or civil war, no.
Correct, a single individual or small group would get clobbered.
How are your guns going to help you when the police helicopters drop incendiary bombs on your house (or compound) at 3AM?
They can't do nothing and if they try, they will go to prison forever.
In the short term, any resistance is a death sentence. However, the gov agents always have to think about whether the person they're encountering is willing to throw their life away. If enough citizens become willing to be dead, real change happens. Sacrifice is required for such events, but clearly having an armed population helps reduce the power asymmetry.
Gangs are that resistance and they are not winning.

In slums, drug cartels found enough of people willing to throw the life away. And as much as they are able to deal drugs, there is no symmetry between them and state. The Dead bodies just pile up.

Armed population does absolutely nothing except lynching here and there. And even those lynching happened with approval from state.

The gangs clearly aren't trying to war against the state. If they were, I imagine the scenario would result in the national guard or a result akin to Mexico.

If the gangs wanted to make a stand against the state, they could. They would need to take and defend their territory while increasing their numbers, likely via kidnapping and child recruitment.

> If the gangs wanted to make a stand against the state, they could. They would need to take and defend their territory while increasing their numbers, likely via kidnapping and child recruitment.

That is a pure fantasy. You know how I know? Because gangs historically and worldwide occasionally tried. This fails all the time.

Lol the Bundys only "survived" because 80% of the cops out there are on their side.

Give me a break, them having guns in no way prevented LE from doing what they wanted.