Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by smoldesu 1060 days ago
> but I dont see what incentive they would have.

They are frequently subpoenaed for information, and turn over that data more often than not: https://www.apple.com/legal/transparency/us.html

1 comments

Yeah, because they are asked to/legally required. I was questioning incentives to hand over information on their own accord, just because they can.
All of these are their own accord. That's even what OP's article is about - if Apple is legally required to break their encryption in the EU, then they will discontinue their product.

Let's not pretend this is a privacy-motivated decision. Where Apple doesn't have negotiating power (eg. China) they have been forced to compromise user safety and privacy[0]. We live in a post XKeyscore world, pretending like this doesn't also happen in America or the UK is a bedtime story for helpless capitalists.

[0] https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208351

edit: s/EU/UK

Huh? Isn't this story about the possibility of the UK government legally requiring Apple to do something?