|
|
|
|
|
by sangnoir
1061 days ago
|
|
You are correct: but I think all these measures are in place because liability is placed on financial institutions rather than individual victims. The owners of the payment infrastructure are correctly motivated to holistically solve the problem, unlike in the US were the person woth the least power and control is burdened with having to contend with "Identity theft" and losing money by default to make up for the fraud. |
|
The reason mag stripe and associated technologies stuck around is precisely because US banks were good enough at real-time fraud detection that the cost of fraud was << cost of replacing every card and strongaming every merchant into buying new payment terminals. Eventually they relented since the US became the place to cash out non-US cards.
And identity theft is absolutely a thing in Europe. As a random example, here is Sweden: https://globalinitiative.net/analysis/21752-2/