|
|
|
|
|
|
by dooraven
1062 days ago
|
|
|
ok now I am confused, as Meta themselves say Palm-2 is better than Llama 2? > Llama 2 70B results are on par or better than PaLM (540B) (Chowdhery et al.,
2022) on almost all benchmarks. There is still a large gap in performance between Llama 2 70B and GPT-4 and PaLM-2-L. https://scontent.fsyd7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.2365-6/10000000... If Google's publically available model is better Llama 2 already then why is it so inconceivable that they'd have private models that are better than their public ones which are better than LLama already. Palm-2 isn't better than GPT-4 but the convo was about better than Llama models no? |
|
|