[ravenstine]

> It's clear that it's not the noun "content" but the adjective, defined as "pleased with your situation and not hoping for change or improvement".

If it was clear, I wouldn't have brought it up. Judging by the Talk section of that page, I'm not the only one who finds that choice of words confusing. It doesn't really matter if it's lifted from a cited article; that article isn't the Wikipedia page.

> I hope the Wikipedia editors are more literate and willing to research than that. I don't think I want to read your version of wikipedia.

What specifically do you object to? A better choice of words? Not being unnecessarily gender biased? Not misrepresenting the state of research?