|
|
|
|
|
by phodge
1063 days ago
|
|
I ran a survey and some one-on-one interviews of 30 or so engineers at my workplace to get some real data about the impact of slow tools. IIRC, the results were something like this: * Most engineers can maintain focus on a task for up to 10 seconds waiting for a slow tool. However a couple of engineers (myself included) will get derailed at only about 3-5 seconds. * A tool that runs for more than a minute will cause just about every engineer to switch task while it is completing. (This means they stop working on their highest-impact work and likely spend time on lower-impact things). * A tool that runs for more than 15 minutes will make any engineer have to start deliberate multi-tasking where they are trying to work on two major work items at once. Also, I wouldn't have read the article or posted this comment if it weren't for the slow CI pipelines at my workplace. |
|
And when - when! - that job fails, you can be pretty sure it racks up some cortisol as one has to interrupt†your second task, pop back to the original context, curse at oneself for forgetting that comma or whatever simple thing, rerun, rinse, and repeat.
†The alternative is to finish (or reach a checkpoint) your other task, but that has cumulative latency effects on the duration of that other task that is supposed to be your main one.