|
|
|
|
|
by tonightstoast
1074 days ago
|
|
Is heat the reason you want to repeal these laws or do you have others? I’m on the opposite side of the issue. I think that tinted windows don’t allow for enough visibility for pedestrians and cyclists. This is anecdotal but they also seem to be used in higher portions of the population breaking driving laws. And lastly, I really don’t enjoy the militant “badassness” associated with these. I want the roads to be more chill, not people going around thinking they’re God’s gift to mankind and any who dares cross them will be punished. These are mostly opinions based on anecdotes. I’ve lived in a few cities now and this remains true. Which is why I’d like to hear your experience. |
|
It's currently 112 F where I am and there isn't a cloud in the sky. Humidity is very low so water isn't absorbing radiation.
Nobody is riding a bicycle or walking long distances six months of the year here, except for the unhoused, and they can only move at night. Cars are mandatory to participate in the economy.
A car with un-tinted windows is impractical for two reasons: solar heat and UV.
The A/C can be running full blast and my legs will still get hot. Normal side window glass doesn't block UV well so I can get a sunburn with my windows closed.
I have to equip my windows with dark tints. It's like a Canadian putting on snow tires except I can't change it out with the seasons.
So my state doesn't have laws against tints because it can't. Ok, so I drive to another state in my car... now I'm breaking the law.
You can say "human beings shouldn't live in such a place" but first, about 114 million Americans live in similar conditions, and second, these conditions are moving north.
Protecting the occupants of a car against solar radiation is a reasonable thing to do.