|
|
|
|
|
by shkkmo
1071 days ago
|
|
The court did not conclude that, or anything about J&J's intentions. The court concluded that the subsidiary was not actually bankrupt and so couldn't justify J&J's attempt to consolidate all the lawsuits against it into a settlements from one bankruptcy judge. This attempted consolidation is pretty clearly an attempt to limit the judgement sizes that may come out of jury trials. Pretending otherwise is naive at best. |
|