[mumblingdrunk]

This is why I switched to Helix. The configuration is practically non-existent, and it has default configs for all the language servers I could ever want to interact with. I just put the language server binary in my path and I'm ready to go with autocomplete and all the other features.

[cayley_graph]

Helix is cool, but it doesn't have Vim keybinds, which is unfortunate. I find its own system to be a little worse than Vim's (see my other comment about it in this thread).

[RMPR]

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LGUG2Z/helix-vim/master/co...

[paulvandermeijs]

I've also switched to Helix recently and I get the feeling that is not emphasized enough how much it is about having default integrations for modern standards like LSP, Tree-sitter, and DAP. It's amazing how much functionality you get with just that and not having any plugins or complex configuration.

[klardotsh]

I actually dread the day Helix eventually gets the WebAssembly plugins system that's been floated around. The current Helix culture of "you get a Kakoune-like editor that can do three categories of "bonus" things, and NOTHING ELSE" encourages a more manageable pace of development (and maybe more importantly: slower updates for those of us exhausted of software churn breaking our stacks constantly), and discourages feature creep/bloat. I love where Helix is at currently. After some tinkering and adjusting a few keybinds, and after a few releases for them to fix various bugs I'd been dealing with, it's quickly become my new favorite editor, and has nearly fully replaced NeoVim. Hats off to Helix.

[benrutter]

I couldn't agree more with this! I actively don't want plugins for Helix either - as tempting as it sounds. Nvim is already a create plugin based modal editor with a rich ecosystem, so Helix's no-config philosophy is kinda it's whole selling point.