|
|
|
|
|
by pyrale
1065 days ago
|
|
The article is from 2017, yet reports number from 2013. In 2017, the total provisioning was 28~Bn€. Also French reactor are still working (and producing returns), as opposed to German reactors. If you focus on dismantling costs, the example of Maine Yankee [1]: is way less dramatic: "In January 2002 Maine Yankee put the total decommissioning cost at $635 million." The number provided for UK reactors is ludicrous compared to existing dismantling costs, and simply factors in 150 years of dry cask storage, whereas France has a deep storage facility on the way. Also the author, Paul Dorfman, is an anti-nuclear proponent, it's not surprising to see this kind of numbers from him. [1]: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dismantling-nucle... |
|
That has been "on the way" for how many years exactly? The reality is that after almost > 50 years of nuclear power we have exactly one long-term storage facility world-wide which has been commissioned last year (Finland). And somehow that was hailed as a success.
Also what do you think the storage cost for deep storage facilities are?