|
|
|
|
|
by Cpoll
1063 days ago
|
|
> how do you vet that One of the maxims of security is that a sufficiently determined and resourceful attacker will always win. The defender's job is to disincentivize the attacker. However, I think for a sufficiently high-impact project no-one should have commit access, every commit should be reviewed by quorum. Even so, you still run into "Underhanded C"-style stuff (and disinterested reviewers), and you still need to vet the quorum. |
|