Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by IIsi50MHz 1072 days ago
> > Hunter gatherers are/were constrained by wild food source densities but also tended to have smaller families

> This conflicts with the idea that they had lower infant mortality.

Not necessarily. Smaller family size can be a result of other factors outside of infant mortality.

1 comments

Today, yes. In a premodern context, not likely.
I gave you the reason right there above, but you cared not to read it: longer breastfeeding period.

Plus the fact that in a hunter-gatherer society people choose not too have too many children for the same reason people make that choice in advanced capitalist economies. Children become a resource burden.

In an agrarian economy, your children are extra hands for farm work. In a hunter gatherer society they are mouths to feed in an environment with intrinsically limited resources.