[3cats-in-a-coat]

Can we elaborate on non-linear computation. How is it different than what we can compute? Note that sensor fusion, which is a process similar to what you describe is a common (and increasingly more so) technique in tech, say in smartphones, drones and other semi/autonomous machines.

[dangitnotagain]

Well, there is a hypothesis that the quantum sieve is an analog rather than binary domain. Rather than spin characteristic, an entire amplitude wave front exists in there, we must find the technology to suss it out.

However this technology resolves itself, the single scope’s domain would be a virtual hyper-dimensional “sub-universe”. An echo chamber which simulates whatever constructive and destructive interference interacted upon it. These combine into “your universe”, and best guess behavioral response is activated.

The virtualization layer (through constructive hyper-dimensionality) would mean the information does not have to linearly propagate through every parsing and rendering necessary to functionally relate.

What might the resolution be for such a scope? Is one neuron enough, or do these couple and entangle, producing higher composite resolution?

As for “things” doing hyper-dimensionalization (or hyper-parameterization) , what is obvious is of (efficient) virtualization layers influencing their evolutions.

Whatever we’re doing is economical for our headspace.