|
|
|
|
|
|
by mrweasel
1070 days ago
|
|
|
> RedHat pulled what is commonly known as a "dick-move" I'm sorry, but isn't that EXACTLY what CIQ has been doing with Rocky Linux. Taking RHEL, rebranding it and then undercutting Red Hat on support contracts? Sure, it was always completely legal and even to some extend supported by Red Hat, but the support contracts is probably what drove Red Hat to make this move. What the hell would Rocky Linux even do if they where successful enough and Red Hat went out of business? Just replace Rocky and Alma with Oracle in any of these complaints and all of the sudden people starts having less sympati. If people are so upset, why didn't they migrate to something like Debian or SuSE when CentOS got axed? I really don't see why people want to stick with a RHEL clone when they're are so upset with the company behind most of the work. |
|
|
Many people did. The remainder were too tied up in the RHEL ecosystem (including CentOS) to make the move, but red hat's recent shitcanery will push many more away.