Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by parker_mountain 1067 days ago
For what it's worth, this narrative has been floating around for a minute, and conveniently ignores _how_ she became a junior programmer. Go look it up :) suddenly "brought on as a jr" becomes less an indictment of her skills, and more an indictment of NASA management undervaluing a woman.
2 comments

BA in mathematics, followed by four years cutting code in non linear dynamics at MIT Lincoln Lab and Cambridge Research Laboratories.

With that background why would hiring Hamilton as a junior at the Draper Laboratory be an indictment of NASA managaement?

Because she was clearly operating at a level above jr at that point?
Ahhh .. you should have expanded upon that.

FWiW I did a pure applied mathematics degree + half an actual engineering course (it got too easy so I transfered to math as they were letting students work directly on control systems for robots rather than rote bookwork).

Four years after graduation, with four years coding experience on things both numerical and symbolic I transferred into a geophysics position developing software for signal aquistion (from sat, sea, air, and ground units), processing, projection, interpretation (this was before Keyhole + google maps | google earth so the group was also writing their own world scale mapping software (late 80s | early 90s)).

Long story short, I had similar experience levels to Hamiliton at that time and I was very definitely a Jr on the team as everybody else had way more eperience than I did.

I guess such things are relative.

Because the majority of programmes today are uneducated.
Just tell us _how_ instead of making us guess? I tried to find the answer but given your exclusion I guess rumours of sexual relations?
Because she was clearly operating at a level above jr at that point?

Also, why would you assume "sexual relations"? That's just crass.

Many times a "you know *giggle*" implies something sex.